If you read the article, you'd get the answer to the first one. Going after Saddam was an America-created problem that shouldn't have happened and has only made the Middle East worse off.

Tell me answer instead And why was there no negotiating with Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein i asked you.

If you read the article or remembered history's lessons, you'd understand that the improperly "negotiated" (dictated) Treaty of Versailles caused great resentment to end World War I to create World War II and Hitler's rise to power. With Saddam... you mean the Gulf War?

Thats not my point,the war in Ukraine have started,and so did ww2 and Invasion of Iraq,why didnt anyone negotiate with them to get peace?

WWII wasn't negotiable due to Hitler's extreme situation 'cause of the improper Treaty of Versailles. Putin isn't at that moment yet. If you don't mean the Gulf War, then the 2003 invasion of Iraq isn't a parallel situation? USA had a goal of regime change. Nothing to negotiate.

In Ukraine we have the security guarantee in the Budapest memorandum as well? Do you think Putin cared about that,like Hitler cared about the Versailles treaty? And both Hitler and Saddam was dictators Saddam didnt care either,but still not my point,why no negotiating.

I don't believe Putin is as closed to peace as Hitler was, especially given Putin's large losses. He needs to save face and a way out w/o embarrassment. The American neo-cons wanted Saddam gone so they could spread "democracy" and be "liberators", so no negotiation interest.

they are all dictators and war criminals How do you negoitate with them?

That didn't stop, say, Kennedy from successfully and peacefully negotiating with the Soviet Union during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Taking the "we don't negotiate with dictators" attitude will never allow for anything productive to come out. One must seek understanding & empathy.

They were not at war allready